↓ Skip to main content

Iron Deficiency and Iron Overload

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Disease in Childhood, August 1965
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Iron Deficiency and Iron Overload
Published in
Archives of Disease in Childhood, August 1965
DOI 10.1136/adc.40.212.343
Pubmed ID
Authors

SMITH, RS

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 30%
Student > Bachelor 2 20%
Professor 1 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Unknown 1 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 40%
Chemical Engineering 1 10%
Arts and Humanities 1 10%
Physics and Astronomy 1 10%
Environmental Science 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2019.
All research outputs
#7,595,686
of 23,155,957 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Disease in Childhood
#3,213
of 7,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#388
of 1,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Disease in Childhood
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,155,957 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,363 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 1,934 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them