| Title |
Evaluation of potential genetic and chemical markers for Scots pine tolerance against Heterobasidion annosum infection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Planta, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00425-019-03270-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mukrimin Mukrimin, Andriy Kovalchuk, Rajendra P. Ghimire, Minna Kivimäenpää, Hui Sun, Jarmo K. Holopainen, Fred O. Asiegbu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 33% |
| Finland | 2 | 33% |
| Canada | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Scientists | 3 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 11% |
| Researcher | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
| Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 20% |
| Unknown | 18 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 26% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 19 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2019.
All research outputs
#8,262,193
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Planta
#679
of 3,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,954
of 353,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Planta
#4
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,151 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.