↓ Skip to main content

Marathon Training and Immune Function

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
28 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
18 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
104 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
203 Mendeley
Title
Marathon Training and Immune Function
Published in
Sports Medicine, November 2012
DOI 10.2165/00007256-200737040-00036
Pubmed ID
Authors

David C. Nieman

Abstract

Many components of the immune system exhibit adverse change after marathon-type exertion. These immune changes occur in several compartments of the immune system and body (e.g. the skin, upper respiratory tract mucosal tissue, lung, peritoneal cavity, blood and muscle). Of all immune cells, natural killer (NK) cells, neutrophils and macrophages (of the innate immune system) exhibit the greatest changes in response to marathon competition, both in terms of numbers and function. Many mechanisms appear to be involved, including exercise-induced changes in stress hormone and cytokine concentrations, body temperature changes, increases in blood flow and dehydration. During this 'open window' of immune dysfunction (which may last between 3 and 72 hours, depending on the immune measure), viruses and bacteria may gain a foothold, increasing the risk of subclinical and clinical infection. Of the various nutritional and pharmacological countermeasures to marathon-induced immune perturbations that have been evaluated thus far, ingestion of carbohydrate beverages during intense and prolonged exercise has emerged as the most effective. However, carbohydrate ingestion during a marathon attenuates increases in plasma cytokines and stress hormones, but is largely ineffective against changes in other immune components including suppression of NK and T-cell function, and salivary IgA output. Other countermeasures, such as glutamine, antioxidant supplements and ibuprofen, have had disappointing results and thus the search for companion agents to carbohydrate continues.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 2%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 193 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 15%
Student > Bachelor 27 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 13%
Researcher 18 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 7%
Other 49 24%
Unknown 38 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 55 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 42 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 3%
Other 23 11%
Unknown 42 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 244. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2024.
All research outputs
#154,773
of 25,634,695 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#140
of 2,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#829
of 287,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#5
of 525 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,634,695 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,892 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,279 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 525 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.