You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cost-Effectiveness of Various Tuberculosis Control Strategies in Thailand
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Value in Health (Elsevier Science), January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jval.2011.11.006 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pojjana Hunchangsith, Jan J. Barendregt, Theo Vos, Melanie Bertram |
| Abstract |
To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of different tuberculosis control strategies in Thailand. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 179 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 42 | 23% |
| Researcher | 34 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 10% |
| Other | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 26 | 14% |
| Unknown | 33 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 56 | 30% |
| Social Sciences | 18 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 8% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 13 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 37 | 20% |
| Unknown | 41 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2012.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Value in Health (Elsevier Science)
#2,971
of 4,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#203,876
of 250,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Value in Health (Elsevier Science)
#28
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,087 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.