| Title |
Predictors of gastrointestinal bleeding in adult ICU patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-019-05751-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anders Granholm, Linan Zeng, Joanna Colleen Dionne, Anders Perner, Søren Marker, Mette Krag, Robert MacLaren, Zhikang Ye, Morten Hylander Møller, Waleed Alhazzani |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 105 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Saudi Arabia | 20 | 19% |
| United States | 13 | 12% |
| Canada | 7 | 7% |
| Colombia | 4 | 4% |
| Mexico | 4 | 4% |
| Denmark | 3 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Italy | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 15% |
| Unknown | 32 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 75 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 20 | 19% |
| Scientists | 9 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 91 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 19% |
| Unknown | 30 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 40% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 32 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2021.
All research outputs
#658,486
of 25,784,004 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#606
of 5,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,656
of 351,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#17
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,784,004 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,493 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.