| Title |
A systematic review of clinical studies on hereditary factors in pelvic organ prolapse
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00192-012-1704-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sabrina L. Lince, Leon C. van Kempen, Mark E. Vierhout, Kirsten B. Kluivers |
| Abstract |
There is growing evidence that pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is at least partly caused by underlying hereditary risk factors. The aim of our study was to provide a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of clinical studies on family history of POP as a risk factor for POP in individual women. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 92 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 20% |
| Unknown | 27 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 49% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 31 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2018.
All research outputs
#7,455,082
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
#691
of 2,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,516
of 172,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
#15
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,939 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,985 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.