You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Joint Healthcare Professional and Patient Development of Communication Tools to Improve the Standard of MS Care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Advances in Therapy, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12325-019-01071-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Celia Oreja-Guevara, Stanca Potra, Birgit Bauer, Diego Centonze, Maria-Paz Giambastiani, Gavin Giovannoni, Jürg Kesselring, Dawn Langdon, Sarah A. Morrow, Jocelyne Nouvet-Gire, Maija Pontaga, Peter Rieckmann, Sven Schippling, Nektaria Alexandri, Jane Shanahan, Heidi Thompson, Pieter Van Galen, Patrick Vermersch, David Yeandle |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 30% |
| Spain | 2 | 7% |
| United States | 2 | 7% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 7% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 4% |
| Belgium | 1 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 67% |
| Scientists | 3 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 56 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 13% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 21% |
| Unknown | 18 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 7% |
| Psychology | 4 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 21% |
| Unknown | 20 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2019.
All research outputs
#2,025,507
of 25,578,098 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Therapy
#181
of 2,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,868
of 351,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Therapy
#7
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,578,098 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,671 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,231 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.