↓ Skip to main content

After the rubber boom: good news and bad news for biodiversity in Xishuangbanna, Yunnan, China

Overview of attention for article published in Regional Environmental Change, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
After the rubber boom: good news and bad news for biodiversity in Xishuangbanna, Yunnan, China
Published in
Regional Environmental Change, May 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10113-019-01509-4
Authors

Jia-Qi Zhang, Richard T. Corlett, Deli Zhai

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 17%
Researcher 10 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 12%
Other 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 24 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 17 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 24%
Engineering 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 27 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2019.
All research outputs
#5,848,257
of 23,155,957 outputs
Outputs from Regional Environmental Change
#730
of 1,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,899
of 349,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Regional Environmental Change
#21
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,155,957 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,847 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.