| Title |
Reproductive endocrine patterns and volatile urinary compounds of Arctictis binturong: discovering why bearcats smell like popcorn
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Science of Nature, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00114-016-1361-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lydia K. Greene, Timothy W. Wallen, Anneke Moresco, Thomas E. Goodwin, Christine M. Drea |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 16% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 6% |
| Spain | 3 | 6% |
| Australia | 2 | 4% |
| Malaysia | 2 | 4% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| San Marino | 1 | 2% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 23 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 38 | 76% |
| Scientists | 8 | 16% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 27% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 16 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 314. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2024.
All research outputs
#110,228
of 25,728,350 outputs
Outputs from The Science of Nature
#11
of 2,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,047
of 316,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Science of Nature
#1
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,350 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,276 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,395 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.