You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
High-throughput-compatible assays using a genetically-encoded calcium indicator
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-019-49070-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nyantsz Wu, Walter K. Nishioka, Noël C. Derecki, Michael P. Maher |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 67% |
| Australia | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 77 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 12 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 22 | 29% |
| Neuroscience | 12 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 6% |
| Engineering | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 15 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2019.
All research outputs
#13,075,529
of 23,155,957 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#56,642
of 125,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,091
of 340,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1,540
of 3,327 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,155,957 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125,203 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,326 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,327 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.