↓ Skip to main content

Discordant introgression in a rapidly expanding hybrid swarm

Overview of attention for article published in Evolutionary Applications, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Discordant introgression in a rapidly expanding hybrid swarm
Published in
Evolutionary Applications, March 2012
DOI 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2012.00249.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jessica L Ward, Mike J Blum, David M Walters, Brady A Porter, Noel Burkhead, Byron Freeman

Abstract

The erosion of species boundaries can involve rapid evolutionary change. Consequently, many aspects of the process remain poorly understood, including the formation, expansion, and evolution of hybrid swarms. Biological invasions involving hybridization present exceptional opportunities to study the erosion of species boundaries because timelines of interactions and outcomes are frequently well known. Here, we examined clinal variation across codominant and maternally inherited genetic markers as well as phenotypic traits to characterize the expansion and evolution of a hybrid swarm between native Cyprinella venusta and invasive Cyprinella lutrensis minnows. Discordant introgression of phenotype, microsatellite multilocus genotype, and mtDNA haplotype indicates that the observable expansion of the C. venusta × C. lutrensis hybrid swarm is a false invasion front. Both parental and hybrid individuals closely resembling C. lutrensis are numerically dominant in the expansion wake, indicating that the non-native parental phenotype may be selectively favored. These findings show that cryptic introgression can extend beyond the phenotypic boundaries of hybrid swarms and that hybrid swarms likely expand more rapidly than can be documented from phenotypic variation alone. Similarly, dominance of a single parental phenotype following an introduction event may lead to instances of species erosion being mistaken for species displacement without hybridization.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 5%
Germany 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
France 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Czechia 1 2%
Unknown 55 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 38%
Researcher 12 19%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 4 6%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 3 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 49 78%
Environmental Science 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 4 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2017.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Evolutionary Applications
#987
of 1,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,796
of 172,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Evolutionary Applications
#8
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,578 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,678 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.