↓ Skip to main content

Restoration of growth by manganese in a mutant strain of Escherichia coli lacking most known iron and manganese uptake systems

Overview of attention for article published in BioMetals, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Restoration of growth by manganese in a mutant strain of Escherichia coli lacking most known iron and manganese uptake systems
Published in
BioMetals, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10534-016-9927-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nadine Taudte, Nadezhda German, Yong-Guan Zhu, Gregor Grass, Christopher Rensing

Abstract

The interplay of manganese and iron homeostasis and oxidative stress in Escherichia coli can give important insights into survival of bacteria in the phagosome and under differing iron or manganese bioavailabilities. Here, we characterized a mutant strain devoid of all know iron/manganese-uptake systems relevant for growth in defined medium. Based on these results an exit strategy enabling the cell to cope with iron depletion and use of manganese as an alternative for iron could be shown. Such a strategy would also explain why E. coli harbors some iron- or manganese-dependent iso-enzymes such as superoxide dismutases or ribonucleotide reductases. The benefits for gaining a means for survival would be bought with the cost of less efficient metabolism as indicated in our experiments by lower cell densities with manganese than with iron. In addition, this strain was extremely sensitive to the metalloid gallium but this gallium toxicity can be alleviated by low concentrations of manganese.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 26%
Researcher 4 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Professor 1 5%
Librarian 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 4 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 21%
Chemistry 4 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 16%
Environmental Science 2 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 4 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2016.
All research outputs
#18,450,346
of 22,860,626 outputs
Outputs from BioMetals
#458
of 646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,763
of 300,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioMetals
#8
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,860,626 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 646 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,128 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.