You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Multivitamin, calcium and folic acid supplements and the risk of colorectal cancer in Lynch syndrome.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Epidemiology, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1093/ije/dyw036 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rowena Chau, Seyedeh Ghazaleh Dashti, Driss Ait Ouakrim, Daniel D Buchanan, Mark Clendenning, Christophe Rosty, Ingrid M Winship, Joanne P Young, Graham G Giles, Finlay A Macrae, Alex Boussioutas, Susan Parry, Jane C Figueiredo, A Joan Levine, Dennis J Ahnen, Graham Casey, Robert W Haile, Steven Gallinger, Loïc Le Marchand, Stephen N Thibodeau, Noralane M Lindor, Polly A Newcomb, John D Potter, John A Baron, John L Hopper, Mark A Jenkins, Aung Ko Win |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 19% |
| Australia | 2 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 13% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 81% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
| Scientists | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 63 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 14% |
| Researcher | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 13% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 24% |
| Unknown | 13 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 17 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2016.
All research outputs
#3,197,178
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Epidemiology
#1,599
of 6,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,858
of 319,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Epidemiology
#31
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,024 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,742 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.