| Title |
Infrared low-level diode laser on serum chemokine MCP-1 modulation in mice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Lasers in Medical Science, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10103-012-1072-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thiago Y. Fukuda, Maury M. Tanji, Julio Fernandes de Jesus, Suélen Rocha da Silva, Maria N. Sato, Hélio Plapler |
| Abstract |
The effect of the low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in the modulation of cells related to inflammatory processes has been widely studied, with different parameters. The objective was to investigate the immediate and cumulative effect of infrared LLLT on chemokine monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1) modulation in mice. Fifty-two isogenic mice were distributed in seven groups: control (n = 10, no surgical procedure), laser I (n = 7, surgical procedure and a single LLLT exposure 12 h after the surgery), laser II (n = 7, surgery followed by two LLLT exposures, 12 and 36 h after surgery), and laser III (n = 7, surgery followed by three LLLT exposures, 12, 36, and 60 h after surgery). For each group, a sham group (n = 21) underwent surgery without laser application. The animals in the laser groups received an infrared diode continuous laser exposure (AsGaAl, 780 nm wavelength, power of 20 mW, energy density of 10 J/cm(2), spot size of 0,04 cm(2)) on three points (20 s per point), and a final energy of 0.4 J. The animals were sacrificed 36 h (laser I and sham I groups), 60 h (laser II and sham II), and 84 h (laser III and sham III groups) after surgery. The MCP-1 concentrations were measured by cytometric bead array. There was no significant difference between the three periods in the sham group (p = 0.3). There was a lower concentration of MCP-1 in the laser III group compared to the laser I group (p = 0.05). The infrared LLLT showed a cumulative effect in the modulation of chemokine MCP-1 concentration. Three LLLT exposures were necessary to achieve the MCP-1 modulation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 50% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 10% |
| Librarian | 1 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 10% |
| Researcher | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 60% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 10% |
| Engineering | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 1 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2012.
All research outputs
#15,242,707
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from Lasers in Medical Science
#650
of 1,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,153
of 156,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lasers in Medical Science
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,302 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.