↓ Skip to main content

Vitamin D Deficiency and Its Health Consequences in Africa

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical & Translational Metabolism, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
159 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Vitamin D Deficiency and Its Health Consequences in Africa
Published in
Clinical & Translational Metabolism, April 2009
DOI 10.1007/s12018-009-9038-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ann Prentice, Inez Schoenmakers, Kerry S. Jones, Landing M. A. Jarjou, Gail R. Goldberg

Abstract

Africa is heterogeneous in latitude, geography, climate, food availability, religious and cultural practices, and skin pigmentation. It is expected, therefore, that prevalence of vitamin D deficiency varies widely, in line with influences on skin exposure to UVB sunshine. Furthermore, low calcium intakes and heavy burden of infectious disease common in many countries may increase vitamin D utilization and turnover. Studies of plasma 25OHD concentration indicate a spectrum from clinical deficiency to values at the high end of the physiological range; however, data are limited. Representative studies of status in different countries, using comparable analytical techniques, and of relationships between vitamin D status and risk of infectious and chronic diseases relevant to the African context are needed. Public health measures to secure vitamin D adequacy cannot encompass the whole continent and need to be developed locally.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 155 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 14%
Student > Postgraduate 23 14%
Student > Master 19 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 10%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Other 32 20%
Unknown 34 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 6%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 41 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2024.
All research outputs
#2,156,985
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Clinical & Translational Metabolism
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,408
of 104,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical & Translational Metabolism
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,190 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them