↓ Skip to main content

Epicardial fat is a negative predictor of spine volumetric bone mineral density and trabecular bone score in acromegaly

Overview of attention for article published in Endocrine, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Epicardial fat is a negative predictor of spine volumetric bone mineral density and trabecular bone score in acromegaly
Published in
Endocrine, April 2016
DOI 10.1007/s12020-016-0945-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elena Valassi, Iris Crespo, Jorge Malouf, David Vilades, Ruben Leta, Jaume Llauger, Eulàlia Urgell, Anna Aulinas, Ana Maria Marín, Betina Biagetti, Susan M. Webb

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 20%
Researcher 3 15%
Other 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Librarian 2 10%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 4 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 10%
Psychology 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Unknown 6 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2016.
All research outputs
#18,450,346
of 22,860,626 outputs
Outputs from Endocrine
#1,161
of 1,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,506
of 301,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Endocrine
#26
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,860,626 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,689 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,014 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.