You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Current and future threats from non-indigenous animal species in northern Australia: a spotlight on World Heritage Area Kakadu National Park
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Wildlife Research, November 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1071/wr06056 |
| Authors |
Corey J. A. Bradshaw, Iain C. Field, David M. J. S. Bowman, Chris Haynes, Barry W. Brook |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 4 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 81 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 21% |
| Unknown | 9 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 33% |
| Environmental Science | 28 | 32% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 12 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2013.
All research outputs
#3,215,160
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Wildlife Research
#260
of 1,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,519
of 89,097 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wildlife Research
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 89,097 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.