You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Coordinated regulation of myeloid cells by tumours
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Reviews Immunology, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nri3175 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dmitry I. Gabrilovich, Suzanne Ostrand-Rosenberg, Vincenzo Bronte |
| Abstract |
Myeloid cells are the most abundant nucleated haematopoietic cells in the human body and are a collection of distinct cell populations with many diverse functions. The three groups of terminally differentiated myeloid cells - macrophages, dendritic cells and granulocytes - are essential for the normal function of both the innate and adaptive immune systems. Mounting evidence indicates that the tumour microenvironment alters myeloid cells and can convert them into potent immunosuppressive cells. Here, we consider myeloid cells as an intricately connected, complex, single system and we focus on how tumours manipulate the myeloid system to evade the host immune response. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,232 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 23 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 6 | <1% |
| Germany | 5 | <1% |
| Sweden | 4 | <1% |
| France | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Belgium | 2 | <1% |
| Denmark | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 20 | <1% |
| Unknown | 2161 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 501 | 22% |
| Researcher | 433 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 269 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 223 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 118 | 5% |
| Other | 296 | 13% |
| Unknown | 392 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 549 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 403 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 344 | 15% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 300 | 13% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 50 | 2% |
| Other | 155 | 7% |
| Unknown | 431 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,115,586
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Immunology
#500
of 2,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,525
of 174,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Immunology
#2
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,693 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,781 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.