Title |
Maize Germplasm Conservation in Southern California’s Urban Gardens: Introduced Diversity Beyond ex situ and in situ Management
|
---|---|
Published in |
Economic Botany, April 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/s12231-016-9333-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Joanne M. Heraty, Norman C. Ellstrand |
Abstract |
Contemporary germplasm conservation studies largely focus on ex situ and in situ management of diversity within centers of genetic diversity. Transnational migrants who transport and introduce landraces to new locations may catalyze a third type of conservation that combines both approaches. Resulting populations may support reduced diversity as a result of evolutionary forces such as genetic drift, selection, and gene flow, yet they may also be more diverse as a result of multiple introductions, selective breeding and cross pollination among multiple introduced varietals. In this study, we measured the amount and structure of maize molecular genetic diversity in samples collected from home gardens and community gardens maintained by immigrant farmers in Southern California. We used the same markers to measure the genetic diversity and structure of commercially available maize varieties and compared our data to previously reported genetic diversity statistics of Mesoamerican landraces. Our results reveal that transnational dispersal creates an opportunity for the maintenance of maize genetic diversity beyond its recognized centers of diversity. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Ecuador | 1 | 20% |
Germany | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
United States | 1 | 2% |
Uruguay | 1 | 2% |
Argentina | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 56 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 11 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 15% |
Researcher | 7 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
Other | 8 | 13% |
Unknown | 14 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 45% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 8% |
Environmental Science | 4 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
Engineering | 2 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 7% |
Unknown | 16 | 27% |