↓ Skip to main content

Behaviour and molecular identification of Anopheles malaria vectors in Jayapura district, Papua province, Indonesia

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
Title
Behaviour and molecular identification of Anopheles malaria vectors in Jayapura district, Papua province, Indonesia
Published in
Malaria Journal, April 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12936-016-1234-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brandy St. Laurent, Sukowati Supratman, Puji Budi Setia Asih, David Bretz, John Mueller, Helen Catherine Miller, Amirullah Baharuddin, Shinta, Asik Surya, Michelle Ngai, Ferdinand Laihad, Din Syafruddin, William A. Hawley, Frank H. Collins, Neil F. Lobo

Abstract

Members of the Anopheles punctulatus group dominate Papua, Indonesia and Papua New Guinea (PNG), with a geographic range that extends south through Vanuatu. An. farauti and An. punctulatus are the presumed major vectors in this region. Although this group of species has been extensively studied in PNG and the southern archipelagoes within their range, their distribution, ecology and vector behaviours have not been well characterized in eastern Indonesia. Mosquitoes were collected in five villages in Jayapura province, Papua, Indonesia using human-landing collections, animal-baited tents and backpack aspirators. Mosquitoes were morphologically typed and then molecularly distinguished based on ribosomal ITS2 sequences and tested for Plasmodium falciparum and P. vivax infection using circumsporozoite ELISA and PCR. The presence and vector status of An. farauti 4 in Papua, Indonesia is confirmed here for the first time. The data indicate that this species is entering houses at a rate that increases its potential to come into contact with humans and act as a major malaria vector. An. farauti 4 was also abundant outdoors and biting humans during early evening hours. Other species collected in this area include An. farauti 1, An. hinesorum, An. koliensis, An. punctulatus, and An. tessellatus. Proboscis morphology was highly variable within each species, lending support to the notion that this characteristic is not a reliable indicator to distinguish species within the An. punctulatus group. The vector composition in Papua, Indonesia is consistent with certain northern areas of PNG, but the behaviours of anophelines sampled in this region, such as early and indoor human biting of An. farauti 4, may enable them to act as major vectors of malaria. Presumed major vectors An. farauti and An. punctulatus were not abundant among these samples. Morphological identification of anophelines in this sample was often inaccurate, highlighting the importance of using molecular analysis in conjunction with morphological investigations to update keys and training tools.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 127 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 15%
Student > Bachelor 19 15%
Student > Master 13 10%
Lecturer 12 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 8%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 39 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 11%
Environmental Science 11 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 6%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 44 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2016.
All research outputs
#13,771,491
of 22,860,626 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#3,707
of 5,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,230
of 300,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#110
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,860,626 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,573 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,819 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.