Title |
Arabidopsis phot1 and phot2 phosphorylate BLUS1 kinase with different efficiencies in stomatal opening
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Plant Research, January 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10265-015-0780-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Atsushi Takemiya, Ken-ichiro Shimazaki |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 2% |
Austria | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 57 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 31% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 12% |
Researcher | 7 | 12% |
Student > Master | 7 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
Other | 10 | 17% |
Unknown | 7 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 46% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 29% |
Environmental Science | 3 | 5% |
Psychology | 1 | 2% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 9 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2020.
All research outputs
#7,478,082
of 22,860,626 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Plant Research
#196
of 830 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,704
of 392,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Plant Research
#5
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,860,626 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 830 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 392,590 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.