↓ Skip to main content

Measuring and categorizing the water-related downstream risks associated with mineral extraction in Honduras: How severe, and how distributed?

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Geography, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Measuring and categorizing the water-related downstream risks associated with mineral extraction in Honduras: How severe, and how distributed?
Published in
Applied Geography, October 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2019.102070
Authors

Nicholas Cuba, Benjamin Fash, John Rogan, Anam Khan, José-Luis Palma Herrera, Rafael Enrique Corrales Andino, Claudia Nataly Mondragón Rivera, Sara Martinez, Scott Sellwood

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 22%
Researcher 5 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 7 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 7 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 11%
Engineering 3 11%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 9 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2019.
All research outputs
#7,209,370
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Applied Geography
#431
of 1,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,730
of 362,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Geography
#8
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,199 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,793 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.