↓ Skip to main content

Suffering among carers working in critical care can be reduced by an intensive communication strategy on end-of-life practices

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
Title
Suffering among carers working in critical care can be reduced by an intensive communication strategy on end-of-life practices
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, November 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00134-011-2413-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. P. Quenot, J. P. Rigaud, S. Prin, S. Barbar, A. Pavon, M. Hamet, N. Jacquiot, B. Blettery, C. Hervé, P. E. Charles, G. Moutel

Abstract

Burnout syndrome (BOS) has frequently been reported in healthcare workers, and precipitating factors include communication problems in the workplace and stress related to end-of-life situations. We evaluated the effect of an intensive communication strategy on BOS among caregivers working in intensive care (ICU).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 146 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 14%
Other 18 12%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 9%
Researcher 13 8%
Other 30 20%
Unknown 42 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 11%
Psychology 17 11%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 45 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2019.
All research outputs
#15,597,573
of 24,717,821 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#4,122
of 5,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,813
of 249,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#21
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,717,821 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,293 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.4. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,586 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.