↓ Skip to main content

Response to Comments on “Productivity Is a Poor Predictor of Plant Species Richness”

Overview of attention for article published in Science, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
159 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Response to Comments on “Productivity Is a Poor Predictor of Plant Species Richness”
Published in
Science, March 2012
DOI 10.1126/science.1214939
Pubmed ID
Authors

James B. Grace, Peter B. Adler, Eric W. Seabloom, Elizabeth T. Borer, Helmut Hillebrand, Yann Hautier, Andy Hector, W. Stanley Harpole, Lydia R. O'Halloran, T. Michael Anderson, Jonathan D. Bakker, Cynthia S. Brown, Yvonne M. Buckley, Scott L. Collins, Kathryn L. Cottingham, Michael J. Crawley, Ellen I. Damschen, Kendi F. Davies, Nicole M. DeCrappeo, Philip A. Fay, Jennifer Firn, Daniel S. Gruner, Nicole Hagenah, Virginia L. Jin, Kevin P. Kirkman, Johannes M. H. Knops, Kimberly J. La Pierre, John G. Lambrinos, Brett A. Melbourne, Charles E. Mitchell, Joslin L. Moore, John W. Morgan, John L. Orrock, Suzanne M. Prober, Carly J. Stevens, Peter D. Wragg, Louie H. Yang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 4 3%
United States 4 3%
Australia 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 139 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 28%
Researcher 35 22%
Student > Master 17 11%
Professor 10 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 6%
Other 28 18%
Unknown 15 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 82 52%
Environmental Science 45 28%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 3%
Computer Science 2 1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 <1%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 19 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2012.
All research outputs
#8,031,797
of 24,829,155 outputs
Outputs from Science
#49,187
of 80,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,043
of 164,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#464
of 793 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,829,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 80,201 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 64.8. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,989 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 793 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.