↓ Skip to main content

Pupil Dilation Uncovers Extra Listening Effort in the Presence of a Single-Talker Masker

Overview of attention for article published in Ear and hearing (Print), March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
171 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
202 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pupil Dilation Uncovers Extra Listening Effort in the Presence of a Single-Talker Masker
Published in
Ear and hearing (Print), March 2012
DOI 10.1097/aud.0b013e3182310019
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Koelewijn, Adriana A. Zekveld, Joost M. Festen, Sophia E. Kramer

Abstract

Recent research has demonstrated that pupil dilation, a measure of mental effort (cognitive processing load), is sensitive to differences in speech intelligibility. The present study extends this outcome by examining the effects of masker type and age on the speech reception threshold (SRT) and mental effort.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 195 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 66 33%
Researcher 39 19%
Student > Master 21 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 5%
Other 31 15%
Unknown 24 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 40 20%
Engineering 28 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 27 13%
Neuroscience 19 9%
Linguistics 14 7%
Other 40 20%
Unknown 34 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#7,960,512
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Ear and hearing (Print)
#485
of 2,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,856
of 168,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ear and hearing (Print)
#3
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,008 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.