↓ Skip to main content

Effect of beta-alanine supplementation on repeated sprint performance during the Loughborough Intermittent Shuttle Test

Overview of attention for article published in Amino Acids, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
Title
Effect of beta-alanine supplementation on repeated sprint performance during the Loughborough Intermittent Shuttle Test
Published in
Amino Acids, March 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00726-012-1268-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bryan Saunders, Craig Sale, Roger C. Harris, Caroline Sunderland

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the effect of β-alanine supplementation on repeated sprint performance during an intermittent exercise protocol designed to replicate games play. Sixteen elite and twenty non-elite game players performed the Loughborough Intermittent Shuttle Test (LIST) on two separate occasions. Trials were separated by 4 weeks of supplementation with either β-alanine (BA) or maltodextrin (MD). There was no deterioration in sprint times from Set 1 to Set 6 of the LIST in either group prior to supplementation (elite: P=0.92; non-elite: P=0.12). Neither BA nor MD supplementation affected sprint times. Blood lactate concentrations were elevated during exercise in both groups, with no effect of supplementation. β-Alanine supplementation did not significantly improve sprint performance during the LIST. Neither group showed a performance decrement prior to supplementation, which might have masked any benefit from increased muscle buffering capacity due to β-alanine supplementation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 135 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 29 21%
Student > Master 27 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 14%
Researcher 7 5%
Student > Postgraduate 7 5%
Other 22 16%
Unknown 26 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 52 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 27 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2012.
All research outputs
#14,180,146
of 24,712,008 outputs
Outputs from Amino Acids
#946
of 1,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,623
of 164,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Amino Acids
#16
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,712,008 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,597 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,787 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.