| Title |
Sex Dimorphism of VO2max Trainability: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Sports Medicine, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40279-019-01180-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Candela Diaz-Canestro, David Montero |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 7 | 16% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 12% |
| United States | 5 | 12% |
| Portugal | 2 | 5% |
| Spain | 2 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 13 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 49% |
| Scientists | 19 | 44% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 90 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Researcher | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 37 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 21 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 42 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2022.
All research outputs
#789,478
of 24,368,983 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#721
of 2,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,260
of 344,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#15
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,368,983 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,822 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 53.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,921 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.