| Title |
Undetectable circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) levels correlate with favorable outcome in metastatic melanoma patients treated with anti-PD1 therapy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Translational Medicine, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12967-019-2051-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Teofila Seremet, Yanina Jansen, Simon Planken, Hassan Njimi, Mélanie Delaunoy, Hakim El Housni, Gil Awada, Julia Katharina Schwarze, Marleen Keyaerts, Hendrik Everaert, Danielle Lienard, Véronique Del Marmol, Pierre Heimann, Bart Neyns |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 70 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 16% |
| Researcher | 10 | 14% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 20 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 31% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 24 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2020.
All research outputs
#16,702,059
of 25,351,219 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#2,323
of 4,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,390
of 347,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#40
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,351,219 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,614 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,498 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.