| Title |
Unexplained exertional intolerance associated with impaired systemic oxygen extraction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Applied Physiology, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00421-019-04222-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kathryn H. Melamed, Mário Santos, Rudolf K. F. Oliveira, Mariana Faria Urbina, Donna Felsenstein, Alexander R. Opotowsky, Aaron B. Waxman, David M. Systrom |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 13% |
| United States | 7 | 11% |
| Australia | 3 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 5% |
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 2% |
| Finland | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 34 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 54 | 86% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 6% |
| Scientists | 3 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 59 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 12% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Researcher | 5 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 26 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 25% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 17% |
| Unknown | 25 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2024.
All research outputs
#905,920
of 25,483,400 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#263
of 4,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,037
of 351,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#4
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,483,400 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,366 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,159 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.