↓ Skip to main content

Revisiting the Empirical Distinction Between Hedonic and Eudaimonic Aspects of Well-Being Using Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Happiness Studies, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
126 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
Title
Revisiting the Empirical Distinction Between Hedonic and Eudaimonic Aspects of Well-Being Using Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling
Published in
Journal of Happiness Studies, October 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10902-015-9683-z
Authors

Mohsen Joshanloo

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 174 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 24%
Student > Master 22 13%
Student > Bachelor 20 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 7%
Researcher 12 7%
Other 32 18%
Unknown 35 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 68 39%
Social Sciences 19 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 11 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 3%
Other 22 13%
Unknown 45 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2023.
All research outputs
#7,422,018
of 22,691,736 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Happiness Studies
#472
of 944 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,730
of 283,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Happiness Studies
#13
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,691,736 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 944 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.0. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,402 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.