↓ Skip to main content

Phylogeography of Begonia luzhaiensis suggests both natural and anthropogenic causes for the marked population genetic structure

Overview of attention for article published in Botanical Studies, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Phylogeography of Begonia luzhaiensis suggests both natural and anthropogenic causes for the marked population genetic structure
Published in
Botanical Studies, September 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40529-019-0267-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yu-Hsin Tseng, Han-Yau Huang, Wei-Bin Xu, Hsun-An Yang, Ching-I Peng, Yan Liu, Kuo-Fang Chung

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Researcher 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 7 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 14%
Environmental Science 2 10%
Unspecified 1 5%
Unknown 7 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2019.
All research outputs
#20,667,544
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Botanical Studies
#120
of 188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#267,084
of 350,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Botanical Studies
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 188 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,816 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.