| Title |
Understanding glycaemic control and current approaches for screening antidiabetic natural products from evidence-based medicinal plants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Methods, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13007-019-0487-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chintha Lankatillake, Tien Huynh, Daniel A. Dias |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Comoros | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 353 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 353 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 39 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 10% |
| Researcher | 21 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 5% |
| Other | 45 | 13% |
| Unknown | 153 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 45 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 28 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 27 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 7% |
| Other | 40 | 11% |
| Unknown | 166 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2019.
All research outputs
#15,161,914
of 23,318,744 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#796
of 1,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,597
of 341,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#27
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,318,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,104 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,605 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.