| Title |
Potential Global Range Expansion of the Invasive Fire Ant, Solenopsis invicta
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Invasions, June 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1023/b:binv.0000022135.96042.90 |
| Authors |
Lloyd W. Morrison, Sanford D. Porter, Eric Daniels, Michael D. Korzukhin |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 199 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| France | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 191 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 47 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 10% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 12% |
| Unknown | 39 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 116 | 58% |
| Environmental Science | 17 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 5% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Unknown | 43 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2022.
All research outputs
#2,187,015
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Biological Invasions
#301
of 2,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,974
of 62,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Invasions
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,525 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,303 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them