↓ Skip to main content

A Consideration of Shukuben (Feces Stagnation in the Digestive Tract)

Overview of attention for article published in Kampo Medicine, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
<b>A Consideration of </b><b><i>Shukuben </i></b><b>(Feces Stagnation in the Digestive Tract) </b>
Published in
Kampo Medicine, January 2014
DOI 10.3937/kampomed.65.309
Authors

Katsutoshi TERASAWA, Hiroyori TOSA, Yoshiro HIRASAKI, Toru KOBAYASHI, Atsushi CHINO

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2019.
All research outputs
#16,893,625
of 24,840,108 outputs
Outputs from Kampo Medicine
#110
of 204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#201,971
of 317,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Kampo Medicine
#7
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,840,108 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 204 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.