↓ Skip to main content

Renewable Cathode Materials from Biopolymer/Conjugated Polymer Interpenetrating Networks

Overview of attention for article published in Science, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
444 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
344 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Renewable Cathode Materials from Biopolymer/Conjugated Polymer Interpenetrating Networks
Published in
Science, March 2012
DOI 10.1126/science.1215159
Pubmed ID
Authors

Grzegorz Milczarek, Olle Inganäs

Abstract

Renewable and cheap materials in electrodes could meet the need for low-cost, intermittent electrical energy storage in a renewable energy system if sufficient charge density is obtained. Brown liquor, the waste product from paper processing, contains lignin derivatives. Polymer cathodes can be prepared by electrochemical oxidation of pyrrole to polypyrrole in solutions of lignin derivatives. The quinone group in lignin is used for electron and proton storage and exchange during redox cycling, thus combining charge storage in lignin and polypyrrole in an interpenetrating polypyrrole/lignin composite.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 344 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 10 3%
Poland 3 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 320 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 93 27%
Researcher 68 20%
Student > Master 32 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 7%
Student > Bachelor 19 6%
Other 58 17%
Unknown 51 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 143 42%
Materials Science 42 12%
Engineering 30 9%
Chemical Engineering 22 6%
Physics and Astronomy 16 5%
Other 20 6%
Unknown 71 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2018.
All research outputs
#1,925,364
of 25,564,614 outputs
Outputs from Science
#27,495
of 83,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,751
of 172,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#242
of 795 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,564,614 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,118 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,900 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 795 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.