↓ Skip to main content

Holocene aridification of India

Overview of attention for article published in Geophysical Research Letters, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
11 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
190 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
175 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Holocene aridification of India
Published in
Geophysical Research Letters, February 2012
DOI 10.1029/2011gl050722
Authors

Camilo Ponton, Liviu Giosan, Tim I. Eglinton, Dorian Q. Fuller, Joel E. Johnson, Pushpendra Kumar, Tim S. Collett

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 2%
China 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 170 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 30%
Researcher 37 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 9%
Student > Master 13 7%
Other 8 5%
Other 27 15%
Unknown 22 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 88 50%
Environmental Science 18 10%
Arts and Humanities 9 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 5%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Other 11 6%
Unknown 35 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,539,200
of 24,784,213 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical Research Letters
#2,987
of 20,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,147
of 260,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical Research Letters
#23
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,784,213 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,904 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,931 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.