↓ Skip to main content

Emergency Department Visits and Readmissions among Children after Gastrostomy Tube Placement

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pediatrics, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Emergency Department Visits and Readmissions among Children after Gastrostomy Tube Placement
Published in
Journal of Pediatrics, April 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.03.032
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adam B. Goldin, Kurt F. Heiss, Matt Hall, David H. Rothstein, Peter C. Minneci, Martin L. Blakely, Marybeth Browne, Mehul V. Raval, Samir S. Shah, Shawn J. Rangel, Charles L. Snyder, Charles D. Vinocur, Loren Berman, Jennifer N. Cooper, Marjorie J. Arca

Abstract

To define the incidence of 30-day postdischarge emergency department (ED) visits and hospital readmissions following pediatric gastrostomy tube (GT) placement across all procedural services (Surgery, Interventional-Radiology, Gastroenterology) in 38 freestanding Children's Hospitals. This retrospective cohort study evaluated patients <18 years of age discharged between 2010 and 2012 after GT placement. Factors significantly associated with ED revisits and hospital readmissions within 30 days of hospital discharge were identified using multivariable logistic regression. A subgroup analysis was performed comparing patients having the GT placed on the date of admission or later in the hospital course. Of 15 642 identified patients, 8.6% had an ED visit within 30 days of hospital discharge, and 3.9% were readmitted through the ED with a GT-related issue. GT-related events associated with these visits included infection (27%), mechanical complication (22%), and replacement (19%). In multivariable analysis, Hispanic ethnicity, non-Hispanic black race, and the presence of ≥3 chronic conditions were independently associated with ED revisits; gastroesophageal reflux and not having a concomitant fundoplication at time of GT placement were independently associated with hospital readmission. Timing of GT placement (scheduled vs late) was not associated with either ED revisits or hospital readmission. GT placement is associated with high rates of ED revisits and hospital readmissions in the first 30 days after hospital discharge. The association of nonmodifiable risk factors such as race/ethnicity and medical complexity is an initial step toward understanding this population so that interventions can be developed to decrease these potentially preventable occurrences given their importance among accountable care organizations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 78 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 15 19%
Student > Master 9 11%
Researcher 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 23 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Mathematics 2 3%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 26 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2017.
All research outputs
#4,127,714
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pediatrics
#2,537
of 12,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,413
of 316,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pediatrics
#35
of 150 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,457 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,337 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 150 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.