↓ Skip to main content

Understanding the minds of others: A neuroimaging meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
389 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
538 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Understanding the minds of others: A neuroimaging meta-analysis
Published in
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, April 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.03.020
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pascal Molenberghs, Halle Johnson, Julie D. Henry, Jason B. Mattingley

Abstract

Theory of mind (ToM) is an important skill that refers broadly to the capacity to understand the mental states of others. A large number of neuroimaging studies have focused on identifying the functional brain regions involved in ToM, but many important questions remain with respect to the neural networks implicated in specific types of ToM task. In the present study, we conducted a series of activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analyses on 144 datasets (involving 3150 participants) to address these questions. The ALE results revealed common regions shared across all ToM tasks and broader task parameters, but also some important dissociations. In terms of commonalities, consistent activation was identified in the medial prefrontal cortex and bilateral temporoparietal junction. On the other hand, ALE contrast analyses on our dataset, as well as meta-analytic connectivity modelling (MACM) analyses on the BrainMap database, indicated that different types of ToM tasks reliably elicit activity in unique brain areas. Our findings provide the most accurate picture to date of the neural networks that underpin ToM function.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 538 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 531 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 115 21%
Student > Master 86 16%
Researcher 69 13%
Student > Bachelor 46 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 27 5%
Other 83 15%
Unknown 112 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 194 36%
Neuroscience 98 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 3%
Unspecified 9 2%
Other 64 12%
Unknown 142 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2018.
All research outputs
#5,132,421
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
#1,950
of 4,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,783
of 315,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
#33
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,284 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,684 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.