You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dropout from Computer-based Interventions for Children and Adolescents with Chronic Health Conditions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Health Psychology, September 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1177/1359105311415558 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tamara L. Dunn, Leanne M. Casey, Jeanie Sheffield, Peter Newcombe, Anne B. Chang |
| Abstract |
Dropout is a frequent problem in face-to-face psychological interventions. However, little is known regarding dropout in computer-based interventions (CBIs). It is important to understand the extent to which children and adolescents drop out of CBIs, so we can ensure that more people complete the programmes to gain maximum benefit. A systematic review of current research on dropout from CBIs identified 15 studies. Dropout rate ranged from 0 per cent to 54 per cent with a median of 15 per cent. There is a need for more rigorous investigation of the extent of, and reasons for, dropout from CBIs with children and adolescents with chronic health conditions. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 52 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 12 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 12 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 16 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2012.
All research outputs
#18,305,470
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Health Psychology
#1,562
of 2,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,123
of 125,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Health Psychology
#22
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,079 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,056 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.