↓ Skip to main content

Pareto parameters estimation using moving extremes ranked set sampling

Overview of attention for article published in Statistical Papers, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#8 of 125)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Pareto parameters estimation using moving extremes ranked set sampling
Published in
Statistical Papers, August 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00362-019-01132-9
Authors

Wangxue Chen, Rui Yang, Dongsen Yao, Chunxian Long

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 29%
Student > Master 1 14%
Unknown 4 57%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 1 14%
Social Sciences 1 14%
Unknown 5 71%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2019.
All research outputs
#5,848,257
of 23,155,957 outputs
Outputs from Statistical Papers
#8
of 125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,339
of 340,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Statistical Papers
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,155,957 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,708 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.