↓ Skip to main content

Detection of “oncometabolite” 2-hydroxyglutarate by magnetic resonance analysis as a biomarker of IDH1/2 mutations in glioma

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Medicine, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
9 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
Title
Detection of “oncometabolite” 2-hydroxyglutarate by magnetic resonance analysis as a biomarker of IDH1/2 mutations in glioma
Published in
Journal of Molecular Medicine, March 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00109-012-0888-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juliya Kalinina, Anne Carroll, Liya Wang, Qiqi Yu, Danny E. Mancheno, Shaoxiong Wu, Frank Liu, Jun Ahn, Miao He, Hui Mao, Erwin G. Van Meir

Abstract

Somatic mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)1 and 2 have been identified in a subset of gliomas, rendering these tumors with elevated levels of "oncometabolite," D-2-hydroxyglutarate (2HG). Herein, we report that 2HG can be precisely detected by magnetic resonance (MR) in human glioma specimens and used as a reliable biomarker to identify this subset of tumors. Specifically, we developed a two-dimensional correlation spectroscopy resonance method to reveal the distinctive cross-peak pattern of 2HG in the complex metabolite nuclear MR spectra of brain tumor tissues. This study demonstrates the feasibility, specificity, and selectivity of using MR detection and quantification of 2HG for the diagnosis and classification of IDH1/2 mutation-positive brain tumors. It further opens up the possibility of developing analogous non-invasive MR-based imaging and spectroscopy studies directly in humans in the neuro-oncology clinic.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Czechia 1 1%
Unknown 65 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 22%
Student > Master 10 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 12%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Other 15 22%
Unknown 7 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 10%
Neuroscience 6 9%
Physics and Astronomy 4 6%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 13 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2024.
All research outputs
#7,012,293
of 22,957,478 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Medicine
#452
of 1,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,319
of 176,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Medicine
#5
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,957,478 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,551 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,794 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.