You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Changes in size distributions of commercially exploited sharks over 25 years in northern Australia using a Bayesian approach
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Fisheries Research, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.fishres.2012.03.005 |
| Authors |
Iain C. Field, Rik C. Buckworth, Guo-Jing Yang, Mark G. Meekan, Grant Johnson, John D. Stevens, Richard D. Pillans, Clive R. McMahon, Corey J.A. Bradshaw |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 2 | 3% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 1% |
| Puerto Rico | 1 | 1% |
| Namibia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 71 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 32% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 16% |
| Unknown | 7 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 43 | 54% |
| Environmental Science | 16 | 20% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2012.
All research outputs
#2,716,052
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Fisheries Research
#214
of 3,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,544
of 179,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fisheries Research
#2
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,182 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,163 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.