You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Defining Dysbiosis for a Cluster of Chronic Diseases
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-019-49452-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lamont J. Wilkins, Manoj Monga, Aaron W. Miller |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 14% |
| Greenland | 1 | 7% |
| Spain | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Japan | 1 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 64% |
| Scientists | 2 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 339 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 339 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 12% |
| Researcher | 40 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 37 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 37 | 11% |
| Other | 18 | 5% |
| Other | 50 | 15% |
| Unknown | 116 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 48 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 22 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 6% |
| Other | 66 | 19% |
| Unknown | 127 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 93. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2024.
All research outputs
#466,106
of 25,729,842 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#5,185
of 142,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,617
of 352,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#123
of 3,311 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,729,842 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142,674 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,311 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.