↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of rapid BACpro® II, Sepsityper® kit and in-house preparation methods for direct identification of bacteria from blood cultures by MALDI-TOF MS with and without Sepsityper® module analysis

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of rapid BACpro® II, Sepsityper® kit and in-house preparation methods for direct identification of bacteria from blood cultures by MALDI-TOF MS with and without Sepsityper® module analysis
Published in
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, September 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10096-019-03654-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Munevver Kayin, Berivan Mert, Söhret Aydemir, Volkan Özenci

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Researcher 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 13 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 6 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 14 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2019.
All research outputs
#18,691,046
of 23,163,378 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
#2,197
of 2,803 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#254,496
of 341,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
#34
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,163,378 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,803 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,020 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.