↓ Skip to main content

Sweat testing to evaluate autonomic function

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Autonomic Research, November 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
patent
8 patents
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
200 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
190 Mendeley
Title
Sweat testing to evaluate autonomic function
Published in
Clinical Autonomic Research, November 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10286-008-0506-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ben M. W. Illigens, Christopher H. Gibbons

Abstract

Sudomotor dysfunction is common in many subtypes of neuropathy but is one of the earliest detectable neurophysiologic abnormalities in distal small fiber neuropathy. Clinical assessments of sudomotor function include thermoregulatory sweat testing (TST), quantitative sudomotor axon reflex testing (QSART), silicone impressions, the sympathetic skin response (SSR), the acetylcholine sweat-spot test and quantitative direct and indirect axon reflex testing (QDIRT). These testing techniques, when used in combination, can detect and localize pre- and postganglionic lesions, can provide early diagnosis of sudomotor dysfunction and can monitor disease progression or disease recovery. In this article, we describe many of the common clinical tests available for evaluation of sudomotor function with focus on the testing methodology and limitations while providing concrete examples of test results.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
Unknown 181 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 14%
Student > Master 25 13%
Student > Bachelor 19 10%
Researcher 18 9%
Student > Postgraduate 17 9%
Other 43 23%
Unknown 42 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 60 32%
Neuroscience 19 10%
Engineering 16 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 5%
Sports and Recreations 5 3%
Other 32 17%
Unknown 48 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2023.
All research outputs
#2,646,194
of 24,393,299 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Autonomic Research
#75
of 835 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,794
of 96,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Autonomic Research
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,393,299 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 835 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,481 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them