| Title |
'You give us rangoli, we give you talk': using an art-based activity to elicit data from a seldom heard group
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2288-12-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sabi Redwood, Nicola K Gale, Sheila Greenfield |
| Abstract |
The exclusion from health research of groups most affected by poor health is an issue not only of poor science, but also of ethics and social justice. Even if exclusion is inadvertent and unplanned, policy makers will be uninformed by the data and experiences of these groups. The effect on the allocation of resources is likely to be an exacerbation of health inequalities. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 83% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 123 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 27 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 17% |
| Researcher | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 15% |
| Unknown | 28 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 26 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 15% |
| Psychology | 10 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Unknown | 32 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2019.
All research outputs
#12,853,567
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,181
of 2,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,195
of 246,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#5
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,000 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,947 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.