| Title |
Center effect in intubation risk in critically ill immunocompromised patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-019-2590-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Guillaume Dumas, Alexandre Demoule, Djamel Mokart, Virginie Lemiale, Saad Nseir, Laurent Argaud, Frédéric Pène, Loay Kontar, Fabrice Bruneel, Kada Klouche, François Barbier, Jean Reignier, Annabelle Stoclin, Guillaume Louis, Jean-Michel Constantin, Florent Wallet, Achille Kouatchet, Vincent Peigne, Pierre Perez, Christophe Girault, Samir Jaber, Yves Cohen, Martine Nyunga, Nicolas Terzi, Lila Bouadma, Christine Lebert, Alexandre Lautrette, Naike Bigé, Jean-Herlé Raphalen, Laurent Papazian, Dominique Benoit, Michael Darmon, Sylvie Chevret, Elie Azoulay |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 2 | 10% |
| Spain | 2 | 10% |
| Germany | 1 | 5% |
| Colombia | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 5% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 12 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 10% |
| Scientists | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 6% |
| Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 23 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 11% |
| Engineering | 3 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 19 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2019.
All research outputs
#3,375,908
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,699
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,019
of 350,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#37
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,816 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.