↓ Skip to main content

Correct Voting in the 2008 U.S. Presidential Nominating Elections

Overview of attention for article published in Political Behavior, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Correct Voting in the 2008 U.S. Presidential Nominating Elections
Published in
Political Behavior, March 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11109-012-9198-9
Authors

Richard R. Lau

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 28 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 45%
Student > Master 2 7%
Researcher 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Lecturer 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 7 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 16 55%
Psychology 3 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Mathematics 1 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2012.
All research outputs
#20,156,138
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from Political Behavior
#758
of 763 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,470
of 156,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Political Behavior
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 763 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,172 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.