↓ Skip to main content

Olfactory function in patients after transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenomas—a short review

Overview of attention for article published in Neurosurgical Review, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Olfactory function in patients after transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenomas—a short review
Published in
Neurosurgical Review, October 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10143-018-1034-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin Majovsky, Jaromir Astl, Daniel Kovar, Vaclav Masopust, Vladimir Benes, David Netuka

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 17 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 41%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Neuroscience 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 18 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2019.
All research outputs
#15,581,198
of 23,163,378 outputs
Outputs from Neurosurgical Review
#352
of 640 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215,765
of 343,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurosurgical Review
#7
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,163,378 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 640 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,860 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.