↓ Skip to main content

Implementing risk stratification to the treatment of adolescent substance use among youth involved in the juvenile justice system: protocol of a hybrid type I trial

Overview of attention for article published in Addiction Science & Clinical Practice, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
Title
Implementing risk stratification to the treatment of adolescent substance use among youth involved in the juvenile justice system: protocol of a hybrid type I trial
Published in
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice, September 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13722-019-0161-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew C. Aalsma, Allyson L. Dir, Tamika C. B. Zapolski, Leslie A. Hulvershorn, Patrick O. Monahan, Lisa Saldana, Zachary W. Adams

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 105 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 13%
Student > Master 11 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Student > Postgraduate 5 5%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 46 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 19 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 9%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 4%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 49 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2020.
All research outputs
#14,267,034
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
#279
of 487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,457
of 350,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
#8
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 487 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.6. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,816 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.